RTOS/TDA2: Adding new usecase and get compiling error “unresolved symbols remain”

January 2, 2019, 12:05 am

≫ Next: LAUNCHXL-CC26X2R1: Timer_setTimeout one day(86400000) cannot work

≪ Previous: CCS/TDA2PXEVM: Code Composer Studio v5.5 install failure

$

0

0

Part Number:TDA2

Tool/software: TI-RTOS

Hello，I'm trying to add new usecase to VSDK, and when I compiled it, I got the error "unresolved symbols remain". Below is the log:

================================================================

# Making tda2xx-evm:ipu1_0:release:vision_sdk_lib...
# Linking into D:/PROCESSOR_SDK_VISION_03_05_00_00/vision_sdk/binaries/apps/tda2xx_evm_bios_all/vision_sdk/bin/tda2xx-evm/vision_sdk_ipu1_0_release.xem4...
#

undefined first referenced
symbol in file
--------- ----------------
Chains_lyratidlOD D:/PROCESSOR_SDK_VISION_03_05_00_00/vision_sdk/binaries/apps/tda2xx_evm_bios_all/lib/tda2xx-evm/ipu1_0/release/app_libs.aem4<chains_main_bios_tidl.oem4>

error: unresolved symbols remain
error: errors encountered during linking;
"D:/PROCESSOR_SDK_VISION_03_05_00_00/vision_sdk/binaries/apps/tda2xx_evm_bio
s_all/vision_sdk/bin/tda2xx-evm/vision_sdk_ipu1_0_release.xem4" not built
gmake[7]: *** [D:/PROCESSOR_SDK_VISION_03_05_00_00/vision_sdk/binaries/apps/tda2xx_evm_bios_all/vision_sdk/bin/tda2xx-evm/vision_sdk_ipu1_0_release.xem4] Error1
gmake[6]: *** [ipu1_0] Error 2
gmake[5]: *** [apps_ipu1_0] Error 2
gmake[4]: *** [apps] Error 2
gmake[3]: *** [apps] Error 2
gmake[2]: *** [apps_exe] Error 2
gmake[1]: *** [apps] Error 2
gmake: *** [vision_sdk] Error 2

================================================================

Below is what I have done:

1. I prepared all the file according the usecasegen document

2. Add the usecase to uc_cfg.mk under vision_sdk/apps/configs/tda2xx_evm_bios_all, 

3. Add the usecase to cfg.mk under vision_sdk/apps/configs/cfg.mk

4. in vision_sdk/apps/Makefile, I add:       -include $(MODULE_SRC_BASE_PATH)/rtos/usecases/lyra_tidl_OD/SRC_FILES.MK

Then I removed the binaries directory and do gmake -s -j depend, then gmake -s -j, and then I get the error I described previously. Did I do anything wrong here?

I also run the command gmake -s showconfig and I did see my usecase was built. The last one UC_lyra_tidl_OD is the usecase I added. Below is the log:

===============================================================================

# Use-cases included in build,
# UC_srv_calibration UC_lvds_vip_dual_cam_dual_display UC_lvds_vip_multi_cam_view UC_lvds_vip_sv_analytics_us UC_lvds_vip_sv_standalone UC_lvds_vip_single_stereo UC_lvds_vip_single_stereo_auto_calib UC_lvds_vip_single_stereo_calibration UC_network_rx_tx UC_network_stereo_display UC_null_src_dec_display UC_null_src_display UC_ov490_vip_sv_standalone UC_saveDisFrame UC_vip_single_cam_analytics2 UC_vip_single_cam_dense_optical_flow UC_vip_single_cam_dual_display UC_vip_single_cam_edge_detection UC_vip_single_cam_frame_copy UC_vip_single_cam_frame_copy_safety UC_vip_single_cam_lane_detection UC_vip_single_cam_object_detection2 UC_vip_single_cam_sfm UC_vip_single_cam_sparse_optical_flow UC_vip_single_cam_subframe_copy UC_vip_single_cam_tlr UC_vip_single_cam_view UC_vip_single_cam_view_encdec UC_tidl UC_semSeg UC_tidl_OD UC_lyra_tidl_OD
#
#

=================================================================================

---

LAUNCHXL-CC26X2R1: Timer_setTimeout one day(86400000) cannot work

January 2, 2019, 12:09 am

≫ Next: PCM1865: Asking for alt. solution to replace AC108 four channel voice ADC.

≪ Previous: RTOS/TDA2: Adding new usecase and get compiling error “unresolved symbols remain”

$

0

0

Part Number:LAUNCHXL-CC26X2R1

Hi TI team,

I used below code to init my timer and I also change timer to one day via the function of Timer_setTimeout.  I want my function just to be triggered once everyday.

But I have no idea why it cannot work. It means my function was triggered less 10 minutes. My function should be triggered at one day. 

By the way, I tried to change to 5 minutes and it could work and my function could be triggered at 5 minutes.

And I think the value of timer should be set over one day(86400000) via Timer_setTimeout because its type is uint_32

Could you help me to check it?

Thanks

#define ALARM_BATTERY_PERIOD 86400000
static Clock_Handle batterytimeClkHandle;
static Clock_Struct batterytimeClkStruct;
static void zclSampleSw_processbatterytimeTimeoutCallback(UArg a0);

static void zclSampleSw_initializeClocks(void)
{   
 batterytimeClkHandle = Timer_construct(
    &batterytimeClkStruct,
    zclSampleSw_processbatterytimeTimeoutCallback,
    10000,
    0, false, 0);
}

static void zclSampleSw_processbatterytimeTimeoutCallback(UArg a0)
{
    (void)a0; // Parameter is not used

    events |= SAMPLEAPP_BATTERY_EVT;

    // Wake up the application thread when it waits for clock event
    Semaphore_post(sem);
}

static void zclSampleSw_process_loop(void)
{
...
  if(events & SAMPLEAPP_BATTERY_EVT)
            {
                 zclSampleSw_battery_check();
                 events &= ~SAMPLEAPP_BATTERY_EVT;
                 if(Timer_isActive(&batterytimeClkStruct) != true)
                 {
                     Timer_setTimeout( batterytimeClkHandle, ALARM_BATTERY_PERIOD); //each 24 hours to check battery
                     Timer_start(&batterytimeClkStruct);
                 }
             }
}

static void zclSampleSw_battery_check()
{
....
    printf("battery\n");
    fflush(stdout);
......
}

PCM1865: Asking for alt. solution to replace AC108 four channel voice ADC.

January 2, 2019, 12:11 am

≫ Next: RTOS/IWR1443BOOST: mmWave studio dump file in Matlab

≪ Previous: LAUNCHXL-CC26X2R1: Timer_setTimeout one day(86400000) cannot work

$

0

0

Part Number:PCM1865

Hi team,
Do we have alt. solution to replace AC108 four channel voice ADC with SNR 108dB performance?

BR,
SHH

RTOS/IWR1443BOOST: mmWave studio dump file in Matlab

January 2, 2019, 12:12 am

≫ Next: AWR1642BOOST: Housing with DCA1000 evm

≪ Previous: PCM1865: Asking for alt. solution to replace AC108 four channel voice ADC.

$

0

0

Part Number:IWR1443BOOST

Tool/software: TI-RTOS

I used the mmWave stereo program using IWR1443 BOOST and DCA1000.

I set the same settings as the mmWave studio user guide on the Radar API tab.

The SensorConfig tab operated the DCA1000 ARM, Trigger Frame with the file 'C:\ti\mmwave_studio_01_00_00_00\mmWaveStudio\PostProc\adc_data.bin' and click Postproc to open a window in the RadarStudio Postprocessing.

I wonder if there is a way to use 'adc_data.bin' file to get the data value of the dumped file('adc_data.bin') from Matlab and FFT it on Matlab.

Thanks

AWR1642BOOST: Housing with DCA1000 evm

January 2, 2019, 12:15 am

≫ Next: TMS320C6654: C665x Pin Map

≪ Previous: RTOS/IWR1443BOOST: mmWave studio dump file in Matlab

$

0

0

Part Number:AWR1642BOOST

Hi i am going to attach AWR1642 BOOST with DCA1000 EVM on vehicle.

Since EVMs are not protected from external obstacles, i want to make a cover for these evms.

Is there any guide or product to protect AWR1642 BOOST with DCA1000 EVM? 

Sincerely

Jinhyeong

TMS320C6654: C665x Pin Map

January 2, 2019, 12:16 am

≫ Next: TPS65217: AM3352 with TPS65217B

≪ Previous: AWR1642BOOST: Housing with DCA1000 evm

$

0

0

Part Number:TMS320C6654

Happy New Year !!!

Is there a pin mapping tables for C665x DSPs ?

I'm planing to use keystone-I C665x DSP for new design. but I cannot define the performance spec. now.

Fortunately, they looks like pin compatible and they can be replaced depends on the performance requirement.

I'd like to use the common feature and pins of them.

Could you provide pin tables of them ?

TPS65217: AM3352 with TPS65217B

January 2, 2019, 12:17 am

≫ Next: TINA/Spice/ONET-10G-EVM: ONET-10G-EVM

≪ Previous: TMS320C6654: C665x Pin Map

$

0

0

Part Number:TPS65217

we are designning devices with AM3352 and TPS65217B , 

power rails of Tps65217b can't work normally,   we removed all loads( removed R530,R534,R537,R538,R540,R542,R545), VLDO1 can hold 5 seconds without PWR_EN, only holds 50mS  with PWR_EN. No output  on other rails. following is the schematic of TPS65217B.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

TINA/Spice/ONET-10G-EVM: ONET-10G-EVM

January 2, 2019, 12:20 am

≫ Next: BQ28Z610: BQ studio "Target Selection Wizard"

≪ Previous: TPS65217: AM3352 with TPS65217B

$

0

0

Part Number:ONET-10G-EVM

Tool/software:TINA-TI or Spice Models

The link  http://www.ti.com.cn/tool/cn/onet-10g-evm?keyMatch=onet-10G-EVM&tisearch=Search-CN-Everything

There is no shematic and user guide in this link .  Would you please provide the schematic and user guide?  Thanks.

---

BQ28Z610: BQ studio "Target Selection Wizard"

January 2, 2019, 12:24 am

≫ Next: ADS1259-Q1: Safety Analysis - FIT rates acc. SN29500

≪ Previous: TINA/Spice/ONET-10G-EVM: ONET-10G-EVM

$

0

0

Part Number:BQ28Z610

Hi all,

Can you give me the "2610_0_19-bq28z610.bqz" file for automatic detection on Target selection wizard for BQStudio Software?

Thank's you and Happy new Year !

Loïc

ADS1259-Q1: Safety Analysis - FIT rates acc. SN29500

January 2, 2019, 12:26 am

≫ Next: CC2640R2F: Secure feature on BLE

≪ Previous: BQ28Z610: BQ studio "Target Selection Wizard"

$

0

0

Part Number:ADS1259-Q1

Dear TI team,

 

this thread is basically a copy of my previous thread 'ADS1259-Q1: Safety Analysis (Reliability data)', that I have closed.

 

Would it be possible to provide me the FIT rates acc. SN29500 for ADS1259-Q1? You can contact me via email.

Thank you very much.

Kind regards

Michael

 

 

CC2640R2F: Secure feature on BLE

January 2, 2019, 12:31 am

≫ Next: Compiler/TMS320F28377S: Compilation error

≪ Previous: ADS1259-Q1: Safety Analysis - FIT rates acc. SN29500

$

0

0

Part Number:CC2640R2F

Dear all.

I can run key_generate.py and secure_fw_tool.py with IDLE tool due to below error.

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:/Python27/Key_gen.py", line 2, in <module>
from ecdsa import NIST256p
ImportError: No module named ecdsa

I found the python code, there is

from ecdsa import NIST256p
from ecdsa import SigningKey

where should I install ecdsa module, I can't find the doc in user guide to follow up. My python version is v 2.7.15.

Many thanks.

Compiler/TMS320F28377S: Compilation error

January 2, 2019, 12:41 am

≫ Next: RTOS/AM3356: SYSBIOS crashes in this function "Task_SupportProxy_swap"

≪ Previous: CC2640R2F: Secure feature on BLE

$

0

0

Part Number:TMS320F28377S

Tool/software: TI C/C++ Compiler

Hi All,

Compilation with Version 18xx puts the error "c_debug_asm_data is no longer supported"...

what must I do now?

Best Regards

Gerfried

RTOS/AM3356: SYSBIOS crashes in this function "Task_SupportProxy_swap"

January 2, 2019, 12:45 am

≫ Next: TIDA-01212: TIDA-01212: problem of sce of tida 1212

≪ Previous: Compiler/TMS320F28377S: Compilation error

$

0

0

Part Number:AM3356

Tool/software: TI-RTOS

My project has two problems now.
1、SYSBIOS crashes . It crashes when the program runs into this function "Task_SupportProxy_swap".Seen from ROV(RTOS Object View), NDK Stack Thread is preempted.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

2、the size of bin file > out file . The size of .bin is 31.3 MB (32,885,664 Byte) and the size of .out is 9.88 MB (10,370,920 Byte). Build the project is no error. Obviously it is a problem.What causes this?

Are these two problems related?

TIDA-01212: TIDA-01212: problem of sce of tida 1212

January 2, 2019, 12:57 am

≫ Next: DP83TC811S-Q1: Was DP83TC811S been used on Qualcomm 9X07 platform?

≪ Previous: RTOS/AM3356: SYSBIOS crashes in this function "Task_SupportProxy_swap"

$

0

0

Part Number:TIDA-01212

HI Sir,

i am working on the bidirectional IR projects

IN the scp project the defaul io pin is 28,29

however, in training

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

in 7:35, it mentions that we need to use IO 5,6,7 as the IR tx for high driving strength, how do i need to adjust the io pin in the scp ?

thanks

Jeff

DP83TC811S-Q1: Was DP83TC811S been used on Qualcomm 9X07 platform?

January 2, 2019, 1:01 am

≫ Next: Linux/TUSB9261: TUSB9261 can not attach SATA HDD

≪ Previous: TIDA-01212: TIDA-01212: problem of sce of tida 1212

$

0

0

Part Number:DP83TC811S-Q1

Hi team,

My customer wants to know if DP83TC811S was ever used in the Qualcomm 9X07 platform. And could you please tell me if there is anything need to notice for the 9X07 platform? Many thanks.

 

Best regards

Chen Jiao

---

Linux/TUSB9261: TUSB9261 can not attach SATA HDD

January 2, 2019, 1:11 am

≫ Next: CC2650: BLE Packet Error Rate(PER) Queries using CC2650 Launchpad

≪ Previous: DP83TC811S-Q1: Was DP83TC811S been used on Qualcomm 9X07 platform?

$

0

0

Part Number:TUSB9261

Tool/software: Linux

Hi,

We are using TUSB9261 with SATA ,  linux can recognize TUSB9261 but storage is not show up.

Could you give some advise how to debug ?

[ 825.729409] usb 1-1: new high-speed USB device number 6 using xhci-hcd
[ 825.883095] usb 1-1: New USB device found, idVendor=0451, idProduct=926b
[ 825.883140] usb 1-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
[ 825.883181] usb 1-1: Product: TUSB9260 Boot Loader
[ 825.883222] usb 1-1: Manufacturer: Texas Instruments
[ 825.883261] usb 1-1: SerialNumber: TUSB9260BL01

Best,

Andy

CC2650: BLE Packet Error Rate(PER) Queries using CC2650 Launchpad

January 2, 2019, 1:16 am

≫ Next: RTOS/LMV7275: LMV7275MFX/NOPB REV A

≪ Previous: Linux/TUSB9261: TUSB9261 can not attach SATA HDD

$

0

0

Part Number:CC2650

Hello,

I am using BLE CC2650 launchpad as Master and Slave. External command containing Advertising interval, required packets and advertisement duration is given to Master via UART. The master then connects to the slave and writes the required advertisement interval and duration to the characteristics of the slave and then connection is terminated. The slave then starts advertising with required adv interval and duration and master keeps a count of the packets received and calculates PER(Packet Error Rate) accordingly at the end of adv duration. Please find the below graphs for testing done in open area and inside RF shield to observe the PER.The RF shield image-STE2300 is also attached below.

I want to know why there is almost no difference in PER calculated when testing is done where both boards are kept outside and when kept inside RF shield.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view. Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

RTOS/LMV7275: LMV7275MFX/NOPB REV A

January 2, 2019, 1:00 am

≫ Next: IWR1642BOOST: DEV board no response after flash in SDK 2.0

≪ Previous: CC2650: BLE Packet Error Rate(PER) Queries using CC2650 Launchpad

$

0

0

Part Number:LMV7275

Tool/software: TI-RTOS

Dear Mr / Mrs

 My client want know LMV7275MFX/NOPB REV has A ? since 2018year.

 LMV7275MFX/NOPB is exsisting REV A and B since 2018year?

Above the QR code are original TI QR?

Label is original?

 There are 2label REV A and REV B

Both original? or not?

Client say REV B is original but Supplier told me A also original .

Pls let me know which is origina label ? or both are original ?

Thanks for read . and Happy new year~

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

IWR1642BOOST: DEV board no response after flash in SDK 2.0

January 2, 2019, 1:05 am

≫ Next: TUSB551: Do you have some ideas about near the connector or CPU for the ?

≪ Previous: RTOS/LMV7275: LMV7275MFX/NOPB REV A

$

0

0

Part Number:IWR1642BOOST

Hi, I have an old IWR1642BOOST dev board that is running at SDK 1.0. I have been performing demo using Demo Visualizer 2.0 download version but recently it have been remove the support for SDK 1.0. So, i try to flash in a image from mmwave_sdk_02_01_00_04/packages/ti/demo/xwr16xx/mmw/xwr16xx_mmw_demo.bin using cloud uniflash. Image download successful but upon running at Demo Visualizer no response after clicking the "send config to mmwave device" Please help if i have missing out some step.

TUSB551: Do you have some ideas about near the connector or CPU for the ?

January 2, 2019, 1:19 am

≫ Next: RTOS / CC2650： CC2650 can't send packet in the IEEE mode

≪ Previous: IWR1642BOOST: DEV board no response after flash in SDK 2.0

$

0

0

Part Number:TUSB551

Hi team,

My customer wants to use the TUSB551 in X86 board.The distance between CPU and interface is 20inch.

i have checked the datasheet of the device, it has EQ and DE, it seems put the device any where is fine from my opinion, do you have some ideas about near the interface or CPU?

Thanks.