Quantcast
Channel: Forums - Recent Threads
Viewing all 262198 articles
Browse latest View live

MSP432E401Y: rtc on MSP432E401Y?


TUSB8020B: Ac coupling of internally used downstream tx signals?

$
0
0

Part Number:TUSB8020B

Hi,

Regarding TUSB8020B;

If the downstream SSTX port is used internally on a PCB, connected to an CPU, do I need to have these signals ac coupled? (USB_SSTXP/N_DN1/2)

Br Mikael

LAUNCHXL-CC26X2R1: BLE5 Established connection

$
0
0

Part Number:LAUNCHXL-CC26X2R1

Hi All,

My client asked me to implement an API as when the peripheral receives a connection request from central, only if user presses a Key (left key), allows the connection is established. Is this possible? Can I postpone establishing a connection and add a condition like this? Is there any event code can inform me a request is received before accepting it?

LMX2594: LMX2594

$
0
0

Part Number:LMX2594

Hi Dean, Noel

About two weeks ago I got from Dean some pictures from the simulation he did for Amimon. (attached the email).

 Yesterday I got from Noel the simulation file (attached also)

I attached also a short presentation (which I already sent you by email 2 weeks ago) with our requirements.

Below are some question regarding the results (I use PLLat version 1.5.4). If you see that a better option to have a short webex discussion instead- please let me know

1.When  I cover (with Noel simulation file)  the frequency range which I need (10.82-12.62 GHz) I got design warning "VCO/MinHighCap Restricted BW". How should I overcome it? is this significant issue?

2. You choose to use is a 2nd order Loop filter . Why?  can you explain shortly (if possible) the trade off to 3rd order

3. The cap C1 you choose is 2.7nF (below 3.3nF). The value gives a yellow mark. How should I consider this regarding you recommendation to use value > 3.3nF.

4. At your simulation file: when I choose "Spurs" tab and then go back to "Filter Designer"  tab and then go back again to "FilterDesigner" tab- I see spurs marks on the graph which have not appear before. Is it a simulation bug ? (I add a picture with a red mark).

5. I added a simulation with the suffix"Refael". At this simulation I change C1 to be 3.3nF and C2=22nF.

Basically I do not see significant differences with your simulation but the value of C1 is 3.3nF here. What do you think?- should I use these value instead? (I can handle the loop filter small degradation at 10.82GHz to Loop=189KHz.)

TDA2PSX-ACD: Functional Safety FMEDA

$
0
0

Part Number:TDA2PSX-ACD

We use the above mentioned part for our system. We had performed a FMEDA for our product and need to look more closely to the TDA2PSX-ACD.

- Could you provide detail data for failure rate calculation?

- Do you have an allocation of areas used for different sub-modules?

- When switching to the device TDA2PHG-ACD is there anything we have to take into account from functional safety point of view?

Thank you for your support.

Best regards

Viktor Tiederle

RCV420: Can RCV420 be used with AC current input.

$
0
0

Part Number:RCV420

I have a very small AC current, can RCV420 be used to get the proportional output.
If not which TI part can fulfil this requirement.

Thanks in advance. 

TPS23881: TPS23881EVM-083 Circuit file and PCB layout file

PCA9544A: Thermal Information (Theta JC and JB)

$
0
0

Part Number:PCA9544A

Hi Team,

Our customer is requesting for the thermal information (Theta JC, Theta JB and max junction temperature) of PCA9544APW, specifically for the PW package (PCA9544APW).

Would you be able to provide the needed information?

We would really appreciate any response. Thank you so much in advance!


Regards,

Jejomar


RTOS/LAUNCHXL-CC26X2R1: BLE stack related issue

$
0
0

Part Number:LAUNCHXL-CC26X2R1

Tool/software: TI-RTOS

Hi,

I am interfacing MAX30102 to the launchxl-2652 , I selected I2C example of the board and interfaced the module to the controller in both interrupt mode and polling mode using the interrupt pin of the module and it worked properly. But when I integrated the code to simple ble peripheral project I started getting too many false interrupts on the interrupt pin of the MAX30102 module. Because of this the sensor I could get the proper values of module. I do not know why it's behaving like, if anybody has any idea when I need to look to solve this issue please let me know.

 I used DIO13 as interrupt pin for the module so I commented the settings for the pin in array

const PIN_Config BoardGpioInitTable[] = {

CC26X2R1_LAUNCHXL_PIN_RLED | PIN_GPIO_OUTPUT_EN | PIN_GPIO_LOW | PIN_PUSHPULL | PIN_DRVSTR_MAX, /* LED initially off */
CC26X2R1_LAUNCHXL_PIN_GLED | PIN_GPIO_OUTPUT_EN | PIN_GPIO_LOW | PIN_PUSHPULL | PIN_DRVSTR_MAX, /* LED initially off */
//CC26X2R1_LAUNCHXL_PIN_BTN1 | PIN_INPUT_EN | PIN_PULLUP | PIN_IRQ_BOTHEDGES | PIN_HYSTERESIS, /* Button is active low */
CC26X2R1_LAUNCHXL_PIN_BTN2 | PIN_INPUT_EN | PIN_PULLUP | PIN_IRQ_BOTHEDGES | PIN_HYSTERESIS, /* Button is active low */
CC26X2R1_LAUNCHXL_SPI_FLASH_CS | PIN_GPIO_OUTPUT_EN | PIN_GPIO_HIGH | PIN_PUSHPULL | PIN_DRVSTR_MIN, /* External flash chip select */
CC26X2R1_LAUNCHXL_UART0_RX | PIN_INPUT_EN | PIN_PULLDOWN, /* UART RX via debugger back channel */
CC26X2R1_LAUNCHXL_UART0_TX | PIN_GPIO_OUTPUT_EN | PIN_GPIO_LOW | PIN_PUSHPULL, /* UART TX via debugger back channel */
CC26X2R1_LAUNCHXL_SPI0_MOSI | PIN_INPUT_EN | PIN_PULLDOWN, /* SPI master out - slave in */
CC26X2R1_LAUNCHXL_SPI0_MISO | PIN_INPUT_EN | PIN_PULLDOWN, /* SPI master in - slave out */
CC26X2R1_LAUNCHXL_SPI0_CLK | PIN_INPUT_EN | PIN_PULLDOWN, /* SPI clock */
CC26X2R1_LAUNCHXL_PIN_RLED | PIN_GPIO_OUTPUT_EN | PIN_GPIO_LOW | PIN_PUSHPULL | PIN_DRVSTR_MAX,

PIN_TERMINATE
};

And also I commented two button menu settings that I found in the function SimplePeripheral_init()
  // Initialize GATT Client
  GATT_InitClient();

  // Init key debouncer
//  Board_initKeys(SimplePeripheral_keyChangeHandler);

  // Initialize Connection List
  SimplePeripheral_clearConnListEntry(LINKDB_CONNHANDLE_ALL);

  //Initialize GAP layer for Peripheral role and register to receive GAP events
  GAP_DeviceInit(GAP_PROFILE_PERIPHERAL, selfEntity, addrMode, NULL);

  // Initialize array to store connection handle and RSSI values
  SimplePeripheral_initPHYRSSIArray();

  // The type of display is configured based on the BOARD_DISPLAY_USE...
  // preprocessor definitions
  dispHandle = Display_open(Display_Type_ANY, NULL);

  // Initialize Two-Button Menu module
/*  TBM_SET_TITLE(&spMenuMain, "Simple Peripheral");
  tbm_setItemStatus(&spMenuMain, TBM_ITEM_NONE, TBM_ITEM_ALL);

  tbm_initTwoBtnMenu(dispHandle, &spMenuMain, 5, SimplePeripheral_menuSwitchCb);
  Display_printf(dispHandle, SP_ROW_SEPARATOR_1, 0, "====================");*/

Signals I captured using the logic analyser for interrupt pin of MAX30102 I attached in the post and I'm currently using CCS 8.3.0 ,BLE SDK version 3.10.0.53 and  zigbee sdk version 2.20.0.6(Please visit the site to view this file)

-Dhananjay

ISO7221C: ISO7221A vs ISO7721D

$
0
0

Part Number:ISO7221C

Good morning, everyone.
In my application I have to isolate a canbus line that works at 500kbps.
Which of the two isolators do you think is the most suitable?

Comparing the two isolators from the DATASHEET I see that the ISO7721 model has more performance than the ISO7221c but the price of the ISO7721 is lower than the ISO7221.

Robert

Compiler/IWR6843: The distance about IWR6843

$
0
0

Part Number:IWR6843

Tool/software: TI C/C++ Compiler

Hi all

We use the demo board of IWR6843,  and compare with our board.  

The distance of ours is shorter than demo board

But we test the EIRP of our board and demo board,  we do not find any difference.

So do the chip have any hardware configuration will affect the distance.

Thanks .  

TPS65988DJ: OVP trip point and slew rate setting

$
0
0

Part Number:TPS65988DJ

Hi team,

My customer would like to consult with you. Is the OVP trip point alway setting at 24V and it couldn't be modify by different PDO?

Can we modify the slew rate by external hardware ? Does the slew rate definition mean the every PDO changing speed or only mean the soft start speed?

And, if the customer use the external power patch for source, does our TPS65988 still have OVP protection function with VBUS pin connecting to one side of power switch?

Ben,

Compiler/OMAP-L138: Ti ARM CGT v18.12.2.LTS & Ti C6000 CGT v8.3.3.LTS compiler error when or included.

$
0
0

Part Number:OMAP-L138

Tool/software: TI C/C++ Compiler

I have been using Ti ARM CGT 18.1.5.LTS for my project which includes (#include <vector> and #include <functional>) for some time with this compiler but now I have switched to

the latest CCSTUDIO and using Ti CGT 18.12.2.LTS I get the following compiler errors (it's the same with Ti CGT 18.12.1.LTS ).

Comand line params:

-mv5e --code_state=32 -me --include_path="C:/ti/ccs901/ccs/tools/compiler/ti-cgt-arm_18.12.2.LTS/include" --define=DEVELOPMENT --define=omapl138 -g --c11 --c++14 --diag_warning=225 --diag_wrap=off --multithread --gen_cross_reference_listing --gen_preprocessor_listing --section_sizes=on

Errors:

no instance of overloaded function "std::__2::__c11_atomic_exchange" matches the argument list .ccsproject /MyArmProj line 1730, external location: C:\ti\ccs901\ccs\tools\compiler\ti-cgt-arm_18.12.2.LTS\include\libcxx\atomic C/C++ Problem

no instance of overloaded function "std::__2::__c11_atomic_exchange" matches the argument list .ccsproject /MyArmProj line 1733, external location: C:\ti\ccs901\ccs\tools\compiler\ti-cgt-arm_18.12.2.LTS\include\libcxx\atomic C/C++ Problem
no instance of overloaded function "std::__2::__c11_atomic_store" matches the argument list .ccsproject /MyArmProj line 1736, external location: C:\ti\ccs901\ccs\tools\compiler\ti-cgt-arm_18.12.2.LTS\include\libcxx\atomic C/C++ Problem
no instance of overloaded function "std::__2::__c11_atomic_store" matches the argument list .ccsproject /MyArmProj line 1739, external location: C:\ti\ccs901\ccs\tools\compiler\ti-cgt-arm_18.12.2.LTS\include\libcxx\atomic C/C++ Problem

I have also been compiling the same code for the DSP using Ti C6000 CGT 8.2.6.LTS successfully for some time, but now I have included (#include <vector> and #include <functional>) I have

needed to move to the Ti C6000 CGT 8.3.3.LTS this however is failing with the following errors.

Comand line params:

-mv6740 --include_path="C:/ti/ccs901/ccs/tools/compiler/ti-cgt-c6000_8.3.3/include" --define=omapl138 -g --c99 --diag_warning=225 --diag_wrap=off --multithread

Errors:

a template argument list is not allowed in a declaration of a primary template .ccsproject /MyDspProj line 5166, external location: C:\ti\ccs901\ccs\tools\compiler\ti-cgt-c6000_8.3.3\include\libcxx\memory C/C++ Problem
a template argument list is not allowed in a declaration of a primary template .ccsproject /MyDspProj line 5182, external location: C:\ti\ccs901\ccs\tools\compiler\ti-cgt-c6000_8.3.3\include\libcxx\memory C/C++ Problem
expected a ";" .ccsproject /MyDspProj line 5150, external location: C:\ti\ccs901\ccs\tools\compiler\ti-cgt-c6000_8.3.3\include\libcxx\memory C/C++ Problem
expected an identifier .ccsproject /MyDspProj line 3487, external location: C:\ti\ccs901\ccs\tools\compiler\ti-cgt-c6000_8.3.3\include\libcxx\memory C/C++ Problem
expected an identifier .ccsproject /MyDspProj line 4955, external location: C:\ti\ccs901\ccs\tools\compiler\ti-cgt-c6000_8.3.3\include\libcxx\memory C/C++ Problem
expected an identifier .ccsproject /MyDspProj line 5150, external location: C:\ti\ccs901\ccs\tools\compiler\ti-cgt-c6000_8.3.3\include\libcxx\memory C/C++ Problem
gmake: *** [MyDspProj.obj] Error 1 MyDspProj C/C++ Problem
gmake: Target 'all' not remade because of errors. MyDspProj C/C++ Problem

Is this a problem or am I missing something?

Thanks in advance,

Andy.

CCS/CC1310: During debugging, debugger is stuck at line "LOG_INFO("Starting " CONTIKI_VERSION_STRING "\n");"

$
0
0

Part Number:CC1310

Tool/software: Code Composer Studio

Hi,

During debugging, debugger is stuck at line;

LOG_INFO("Starting " CONTIKI_VERSION_STRING "\n");

I am reading this problem in many threads but didn't find any solution.

Did anybody solve this problem? If yes, how?

LAUNCHXL-CC1350: Performance of sending via radio with EasyLink

$
0
0

Part Number:LAUNCHXL-CC1350

Hello,

I am sending data via radio with a CC1350 microcontroller. I measured the time it takes to transmit a 128byte message (the blocking API - the time measured was the time taken by the EasyLink_transmit method) with the EasyLink library and the value measured was ~ 15ms. Is this normal. How can I shorten this time ?

Thank you very much!

Cristian


LM25118: Low output efficiency

$
0
0

Part Number:LM25118

Dear all:

      The output of LM25118 is 5V, and the input is also about 5V (PC supplies 5V). The efficiency, I measurement the input voltage, input current, output voltage and output current are measured to calculate efficiency the test results  are as follows:

(5.035V*0.496A)/(4.985V*0.673A)=74.4%

is only about 70%.But I think the Data sheet is pretty efficient.

Please help to analyze the possible reasons for the inefficiency.How to improve output efficiency?

OPT3001: OPT3001DNPR driver under Android 8.1 system

$
0
0

Part Number:OPT3001

Hi:

          Can you provide OPT3001DNPR driver under Android 8.1 system? Thank you !

TMS320F28035: power selection for PD pin of JTAG Header

$
0
0

Part Number:TMS320F28035

Does the PD pin of JTAG Header have to connect to the VDDIO? Customer wants to power PD pin with 5V come from USB.

I checked the below statement for PD pin.  It seems that connecting to VDDIO can indicate the emulator whether C2000 is powered up or not, right?

Presence detect. This signal indicates that the emulation cable is connected and that the target is powered up. PD should be tied to V CC in the target system.

RTOS/TDA3XEVM: Why some algorithms required for building the sdk, even the algorithm is not used in the usescases?

$
0
0

Part Number:TDA3XEVM

Tool/software: TI-RTOS

Hi,

We are in the process of removing the unwanted usecases and alogorithms in the apps project of vision sdk, below we have some questions regarding build system.

1) Is this the right way to remove the unwanted usecases and algorithms from apps folder?

2) We removed some of the algorithms in alg_plugins, but we hope these mentioned alogorithms are required for building the sdk E.g(edgedetection,streo_app,denseopticalflow,surrondview..etc). We looked into the MAKEFILE.MK and the below libraries are included by default in sdk, eventhough ALG_var_name is not set in the usescases. Could we know what is the reason?

DSP_ALG_LIBS += $($(MAKEAPPNAME)_PATH)/src/rtos/alg_plugins/commonutils/lib/commonutils_c66xdsp_$(PROFILE_c66xdsp_1).ae66
DSP_ALG_LIBS += $($(MAKEAPPNAME)_PATH)/src/rtos/alg_plugins/structurefrommotion/lib/structurefrommotion_c66xdsp_$(PROFILE_c66xdsp_1).ae66
DSP_ALG_LIBS += $($(MAKEAPPNAME)_PATH)/src/rtos/alg_plugins/surroundview/lib/surroundview_c66xdsp_$(PROFILE_c66xdsp_1).ae66
DSP_ALG_LIBS += $($(MAKEAPPNAME)_PATH)/src/rtos/alg_plugins/autocalibration/lib/autocalibration_c66xdsp_$(PROFILE_c66xdsp_1).ae66
DSP_ALG_LIBS += $($(MAKEAPPNAME)_PATH)/src/rtos/alg_plugins/autoremap/lib/autoremap_c66xdsp_$(PROFILE_c66xdsp_1).ae66

APP_LIBS_c66xdsp_1 +=$($(MAKEAPPNAME)_PATH)/src/rtos/alg_plugins/rear_view_panorama/lib/rear_view_panorama_c66xdsp_$(PROFILE_c66xdsp_1).ae66
APP_LIBS_c66xdsp_2 +=$($(MAKEAPPNAME)_PATH)/src/rtos/alg_plugins/rear_view_panorama/lib/rear_view_panorama_c66xdsp_$(PROFILE_c66xdsp_2).ae66
APP_LIBS_c66xdsp_1 +=$($(MAKEAPPNAME)_PATH)/src/rtos/alg_plugins/stereo_app/lib/stereo_app_c66xdsp_$(PROFILE_c66xdsp_1).ae66
APP_LIBS_c66xdsp_2 +=$($(MAKEAPPNAME)_PATH)/src/rtos/alg_plugins/stereo_app/lib/stereo_app_c66xdsp_$(PROFILE_c66xdsp_2).ae66

Best Regards

Prakash

ISO3088: Replacement document

$
0
0

Part Number:ISO3088

Hi guys,

Do we have a Blog or document, which explains porting from ISO3088 to a newer device?

Whats the best device replacing the ISO3088 for a new design?

Thanks,

Needhu

Viewing all 262198 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>