Quantcast
Channel: Forums - Recent Threads
Viewing all 262198 articles
Browse latest View live

AMC1305L25: Single End Communication

$
0
0

Part Number:AMC1305L25

1. Is AMC1305L25 able to be configured as single-end communication when both CLKIN_N and DOUT_N pin are connected to ground? Or only LVDS communication is used?

2. Is SN65LVDT14 only one transceiver for the AMC1305L25 communication with C2K/MCU?

Regards

Brian W


CC1352P: Regarding CC1352 Device id length

$
0
0

Part Number:CC1352P

Hi,

I am working on CC1352P, i had a query regarding CC1352P device id, i.e., whether the device id is fixed length or variable length. 

Thanks & Regards

Haricharan.

`

LMP7731: Shelf life

$
0
0

Part Number:LMP7731

Hi, 

What is the recommended shelf life for LMP7731MA/NOPB? Is it okay if we use it with a lot date of Jan 2013 on a noise sensitive board without causing reliability and functionality issues?

Thanks,

Saeedeh

Compiler/TMS320F28377D: Undefined first referenced HVACI_Sensorless_28377D

$
0
0

Part Number:TMS320F28377D

Tool/software: TI C/C++ Compiler

Dear TI Hello,

I am working on the migration code of the HVACI_sensorless floating point from the F28335 to the F28377D,

I couldn't understand why the compiler told me undefined referenced of the A0,B0,...even if functions are defined in the same file,

// Alpha states
void A0(void);	//state A0
void B0(void);	//state B0
void C0(void);	//state C0

// A branch states
void A1(void);	//state A1
void A2(void);	//state A2
void A3(void);	//state A3

// B branch states
void B1(void);	//state B1
void B2(void);	//state B2
void B3(void);	//state B3

// C branch states
void C1(void);	//state C1
void C2(void);	//state C2
void C3(void);	//state C3

// Variable declarations
void (*Alpha_State_Ptr)(void);	// Base States pointer
void (*A_Task_Ptr)(void);		// State pointer A branch
void (*B_Task_Ptr)(void);		// State pointer B branch
void (*C_Task_Ptr)(void);		// State pointer C branch
// Tasks State-machine init
	Alpha_State_Ptr = &A0;
	A_Task_Ptr = &A1;
	B_Task_Ptr = &B1;
	C_Task_Ptr = &C1;

console output:

warning #10247-D: creating output section "DLOG" without a SECTIONS specification

undefined first referenced

symbol in file

--------- ----------------

_A0 ./HVACI_Sensorless.obj

_A1 ./HVACI_Sensorless.obj

_B1 ./HVACI_Sensorless.obj

_C1 ./HVACI_Sensorless.obj

error #10234-D: unresolved symbols remain

error #10010: errors encountered during linking; "HVACI_Sensorless_28377D.out" not built

TMS320DM8147: TMS320DM8148CCYE0

$
0
0

Part Number:TMS320DM8147

Please, I need to ask urgently about  TMS320DM8148CCYE0, is this support both Video Encoder, Video Decoder? or it supports one of them (Encoder or Decoder)?

Appreciate your fast response urgently

CCS/UCD3138A64OEVM-662: burning or loading program permanently into flash memory

$
0
0

Part Number:UCD3138A64OEVM-662

Tool/software: Code Composer Studio

Sir I need to burn my program into flash memory and it should remain over there permanently

Now when I'm running a blinking LED program, led blinks until my board is connected to power supply once I remove power and reconnect it the code is lost from the memory

Can you please provide the code for burning program permanently into flash memory using JTAG so that whenever I power it the LED should blink.

How to select a appropriate TVS?

$
0
0

TVS is common ESD protection component and I have questions regarding it.

1. Some TVS families seems be designed for power lines particularly. Should we select different TVS for power lines and data lines?

2. Sometimes, I see engineers use TVS for USB VBUS and the maximum VRWM (Reverse standoff voltage) is 5.0V. However, the VBUS may exceed 5V. Many USB power supplies provide the 5.1V or 5.2V voltage and the specification of VBUS is 4.75V to 5.25V. I'm wondering If it is a good idea to use the TVS which maximum VRWM is 5.0V for USB VBUS? Or it is better to select the TVS which is with 5.5V or 6.0V VRWM?

ADS54J40EVM: ADS54J40: Data sampled from ads54j40 is problem,need you suggestion.

$
0
0

Part Number:ADS54J40EVM

I am using ads54j40;Fs=1000MHz   LMFS=8224    SYSREF=1000/512=1.953125    K=16

XILINX K7 325 for FPGA;

DA0->MGTXRXP0_115,DA1->MGTXRXP1_115,DA2->MGTXRXP2_115,DA3->MGTXRXP3_115,

DB0->MGTXRXP0_116,DB1->MGTXRXP1_116,DB2->MGTXRXP2_116,DB3->MGTXRXP3_116,

using 8 lanes;   GTX :   rx_data  [255:0]

so  my  data analysis

     adc0_sample0<={rx_tdata[7:0],    rx_tdata[15:10]  };
     adc0_sample1<={rx_tdata[23:16],  rx_tdata[31:26]  };
     adc0_sample2<={rx_tdata[39:32],  rx_tdata[47:42]  };
     adc0_sample3<={rx_tdata[55:48],  rx_tdata[63:58]  };      
     adc0_sample4<={rx_tdata[71:64],  rx_tdata[79:74]  };
     adc0_sample5<={rx_tdata[87:80],  rx_tdata[95:90]  };   
     adc0_sample6<={rx_tdata[103:96], rx_tdata[111:106]};
     adc0_sample7<={rx_tdata[119:112],rx_tdata[127:122]};  


     adc1_sample0<={rx_tdata[135:128],  rx_tdata[143:138]};
     adc1_sample1<={rx_tdata[151:144],  rx_tdata[159:154]};
     adc1_sample2<={rx_tdata[167:160],  rx_tdata[175:170]};
     adc1_sample3<={rx_tdata[183:176],  rx_tdata[191:186]};      
     adc1_sample4<={rx_tdata[199:192],  rx_tdata[207:202]};
     adc1_sample5<={rx_tdata[215:208],  rx_tdata[223:218]};   
     adc1_sample6<={rx_tdata[231:224],  rx_tdata[239:234]};
     adc1_sample7<={rx_tdata[247:240],  rx_tdata[255:250]};

but Data sheet :Table 11. Default Frame Assembly:A0  A1  A2  A3

why is Table 11  LMFS=8224?

how to  data analysis?


TPS2552: AP2552 Replace Plan

$
0
0

Part Number:TPS2552

Dear Team,

What is the best solution to replace AP2552?

BR

Kevin

LM4898: Output State in Shutdown Mode

$
0
0

Part Number:LM4898

Hello,

When the LM4898 is put into shutdown mode, can I assume that the output stage is turned off and that the output enters a high-impedance state? In particular, I would like to ensure that there is no signal pass-through from input to output when shutdown is enabled.

Thank you!

Chris

CCS/TMS320F28335: The application code which is download after the bootloader code will cover the bootloader code, how to avoid that?

$
0
0

Part Number:TMS320F28335

Tool/software: Code Composer Studio

Dears,

     F28335 is used for the motor driver, there are 2 parts of the code, one is the bootloader code, the other is the application code.

the bootloader code was programed into DSP first, and then the application code will be programed. If the later application was download in a CAN bus, the later code will not cover the bootloader code, but if the application code was programed in a JTAG way, the later code will cover the bootloader code, how to avoid this covering when using a JTAG way to down load the application code after the bootloader code was download?

      Finally, is there a better way to solve this issue? for example, how can I down load the bootloader code and application code in one time rather than separately?

    Thanks.

PCM3070RHBEVM-K: PCM3070RHBEVM can't capture USB HW

$
0
0

Part Number:PCM3070RHBEVM-K

Hi,

Customer received EVM board but PC can't capture USB HW.

So far, PC still can't capture USB HW. 

Please help to advised, thank you.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 Our verify/check process our below:

1.Install PCM3070-K CS v1.2.3(Rev.A) which include TAS1020B(digital audio interface) driver.

But PC can’t capture new USB HW.

2. Try to swap in PC(Win7 base) other USB port and install PCM3070-K CS in the other 2 PC(WIN8 and Win10 base) also can’t capture USB HW.

3.Right-click the PCM3070EVM-K CS shortcut and select properties to choose Win7 compatibility mode => Still can’t capture USB HW.


4.Base on EVM connection description, we can saw the D2 illumination(#5) but Still can’t capture USB HW.

5.We also double confirm the USB SW2 setting, number 2&8 OFF and others turn ON which are same as default.=> Still can’t capture USB HW.


 

Warm Regards,

Lin

TMS320F28027: if you can return the PCBA when you test the DSP

$
0
0

Part Number:TMS320F28027

We want to send the PCBA to get the FA report,  Could you help check whether you can return the PCBA when you finish the analysis? Urgent need the feedback,Thanks! 

OPA549: High current, precision amplifiers for 18bit or 20bit DAC buffering

$
0
0

Part Number:OPA549

Dear Power OP-AMP team, We want to drive a DC motor using 18 bit/20 bit DACs with an update rate of 2.5us, and the precision DAC signal is used to control the speed/position of a DC motor. We want to use Power OpAmp between the DAC and the motor. The DAC is 18/20 bit, is there any Power OpAmp that is low noise, and is capable of delivering 2A~8A current that we can use? we are currently evaluating Opa549-HiRel in simulation, and would like to know whether it can be used in this application, or, do you have any alternative suggestion?

BQ27426: Qmax & Ra Table not updated

$
0
0

Part Number:BQ27426

Hi,

I'm having troubles enabling Qmax and Ra update.

After POR I update Chemistry Profile and I set Design Capacity, Design Energy, Terminate Voltage and Taper Rate and disable the SLEEP mode. All other parameters are unchanged.

However Qmax and Ra are never updated, what am I doing wrong?

Control_Status(QMAX_UP) = 0

Control_Status(RES_UP) = 0

Control_Status(RUP_DIS) = 1 - why is it disabled and how to enable it?

Control_Status(VOK) = 0 - when is VOK set?

Control_Status bits are the same during charging and discharging...

Thanks!


LMR33630: Large inrush current with inverting buck operation

$
0
0

Part Number:LMR33630

Hello,

I designed a board using the LMR33630ARNXT in the inverting buck mode to generate -9V from a 24V supply and I am seeing issues when power is cycled and the output capacitors are not discharged.

On initial power up with everything discharged the inrush current is a quick spike as expected but when power is cycled and the inrush current peaks to 3.5A for ~25ms causing a supply rated for 3A to enter over current protection. 

Swapping to a supply rated for 5A the power rail comes up but the large inrush current is still seen when powering VIN without discharging the Output capacitors.

The EN pin was tied to VIN so the device starts up when the VIN rail reaches ~2V (LMR33630A undervoltage lock-out threshold), could this be the issue?

I am not sure why there is a difference when powering the board with the output caps discharged vs charged.

Thanks,

Sean

CCS/CC2640R2F: Error connecting to the target: (Error -242 @ 0x0) A router subpath could not be accessed.

$
0
0

Part Number:CC2640R2F

Tool/software: Code Composer Studio

Hello.

I have a custom board using the 4x4mm QFN version of CC2640R2F, which I try to debug through the XDS110 of the CC2640R1 launchpad. The following error message is displayed every time I attempt to flash the ble5_simple_peripheral demo project :

IcePick_C: Error connecting to the target: (Error -242 @ 0x0) A router subpath could not be accessed. The board configuration file is probably incorrect. (Emulation package 8.1.0.00005)

Everything works fine when I attempt to flash the device located onto the launchpad, so it most likely doesn't come from my computer.

Also, when I run a test connection on the .ccxml target config file, it works once after reset, but the subsequent tests will return the same error message, until next reset. This makes me think it is probably not a hardware problem.

I am using the RCOSC configuration and the CC2640R2DK_4XS board file provided by TI (at least I set CC2640R2DK_4XS in the build predefined symbols, if there is something more to do to use the file, please tell me).

Most topic about this same error message speak of a problem occurring from time to time, or were caused by hardware problems, so I could not find any helpful information.

I guess the problem is somewhere in the board configuration firmware, but I don't know what it could be exactly, so my question is where should I look, or what should I try to change from the demo project?

Thank you.

CCS/LAUNCHXL-CC26X2R1: Central printing legacy ScanRsp

$
0
0

Part Number:LAUNCHXL-CC26X2R1

Tool/software: Code Composer Studio

Hi,

The target here is to print out the scanRsp data of type `GapScan_Evt_AdvRpt_t` in SC_EVT_ADV_REPORT, from a legacy BLE 4.x peripheral. 

I have loaded the central example project from latest simple link 3_10_00_53.

Then followed the following steps to print the 1M PHY ScanRsp, 

http://dev.ti.com/tirex/content/simplelink_academy_cc13x2sdk_2_20_03_05/modules/ble5stack/ble_scan_adv_basic/ble_scan_adv_basic.html

We are using a custom peripheral, with legacy scanRsp (scanable).

so I changed `SCAN_TYPE_PASSIVE` to `SCAN_TYPE_ACTIVE`, and

#define DEFAULT_SCAN_PHY LL_PHY_NONE

Looking at `evtType` , it seems to hold the value 0x13, which according to LL_ae.h is a bitfield of CONNECTABLE + SCANNABLE + LEGACY

so I added printing the ADV_RPT_EVT_TYPE_LEGACY

static uint8_t roww = 0;
//Print scan response data or advertising data
if(0!=(pAdvRpt->evtType & ADV_RPT_EVT_TYPE_LEGACY))
{
Display_print1(dispHandle, (TBM_ROW_APP + 10 + (roww++)), 0, "ADV_RPT_EVT_TYPE_LEGACY: %s",
Util_convertBdAddr2Str(pAdvRpt->addr));
Display_print1(dispHandle, (TBM_ROW_APP + 10 + (roww++)), 0, "ADV_RPT_EVT_TYPE_LEGACY: %s",
Util_convertBytes2Str(pAdvRpt->pData, pAdvRpt->dataLen));
}
else if(pAdvRpt->evtType == ADV_RPT_EVT_TYPE_SCAN_RSP)
{
Display_print1(dispHandle, (TBM_ROW_APP + 10 + (roww++)), 0, "ScanResponseAddr: %s",
Util_convertBdAddr2Str(pAdvRpt->addr));
Display_print1(dispHandle, (TBM_ROW_APP + 10 + (roww++)), 0, "ScanResponseData: %s",
Util_convertBytes2Str(pAdvRpt->pData, pAdvRpt->dataLen));
}
else
{
Display_print2(dispHandle, (TBM_ROW_APP + 10 + (roww++)), 0, "Advertising Addr: %s RSSI: %d",
Util_convertBdAddr2Str(pAdvRpt->addr), pAdvRpt->rssi);
Display_print1(dispHandle, (TBM_ROW_APP + 10 + (roww++)), 0, "Advertising Data: %s",
Util_convertBytes2Str(pAdvRpt->pData, pAdvRpt->dataLen));
}

but it doesn't have the scan response... could you please let me know what is still missing here? 

Jerome

DP83822I: Replace from TLK105LRHBR to DP83822IRHBR

$
0
0

Part Number:DP83822I

Dear Technical Support Team

I'd like to replace from TLK105LRHBR to DP83822IRHBR.

I see DP83822 Hardware Rollover.

http://www.ti.com/lit/an/snla262/snla262.pdf

I refer to this document.

Is it possible to replace about AC and DC characterization, too?

AC and DC characterization seems be slightly different between TLK105LRHBR and DP83822IRHBR.

Best Regards,

ttd

DS90UB925Q-Q1: Replace DS90UB921 with DS90UB925 to pair with DS90UB940

$
0
0

Part Number:DS90UB925Q-Q1

I posted the following in this forum a while ago about pairing DS90UB921 with DS90UB940 :

https://e2e.ti.com/support/interface/f/138/t/790309

I am not too sure how well the with DS90UB921 is being distributed (discontinued at digikey non stock in Mouser). Long story short, I am wary about using the part in design. Based on the forum post above:

1) Is there anything I have to be worried about by using the with DS90UB925 instead of the with DS90UB921 with the with DS90UB940?

2) On page 26 of the UB940 it says: Note: if paired with a DS90UB925Q-Q1serializer, the devices must be configured into 18-bit mode to allow usage of GPIO pins on the serializer. Does this mean I would not be able to use the GPIOs on the serializer if I'm doing 24-bit?

3) On page 31 of the UB940 it says: The DS90UB940-Q1 is also backward compatible to the DS90UB925Q-Q1, DS90UB925AQ-Q1, and DS90UB927Q-Q1 for PCLK frequencies ranging from 25MHz to 85MHz. Does this mean I can't use the full range of the UB25 (5 to 85MHz) when paired with the UB940? My sensor does 13.5 MHz or 27 MHz only... if this is the case I'll have to use 27 MHz?

4) Why is the distribution of the UB921 so unorthodox?

Thanks,

JP

Viewing all 262198 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>